The Associated Press has producted a solid update on an emerging MSM theme in the wake of the London bombings -- the debate inside mainstream Islam over when violence is acceptable and when it is not. A serious uptick in coverage of this issue is crucial, especially for moderate Muslims and others interested in religious liberty. I'll keep this short, since correspondent Thomas Wagner's report about the gathering at London's largest mosque is wire-service direct and you can read it for yourself. The heart of the whole matter is Israel, of course, but the wording also applies to Iraq. The key: suicide bombings can be used against "occupying forces." Would this also include Saudi Arabian heretics in Mecca, if the first name of the person making this deadly theological decision is Osama?
"There should be a clear distinction between the suicide bombing of those who are trying to defend themselves from occupiers, which is something different from those who kill civilians, which is a big crime," said Sayed Mohammed Musawi, the head of the World Islamic League in London.
"The media in the West are mixing the difference between these two, and the result is that some of our Muslim youth are becoming more frustrated and they think that both are the same, even though Muslim law forbids killing any innocent lives," Musawi said.
Once again, please let us know of other stories addressing these issues. I hope, for starters, AP lets Wagner and others stay on the topic.