A journalism fellowship program I’m involved with recently heard from one Sam Feist, CNN’s Washington, D.C., bureau chief. He told us that many moons ago, heâd written some copy for the on-air talent to read for that nightâs show. The line was something like âClinton believes that the tax bill will pass.â The guy who was supposed to read the line â he happened to be an old-school journalist of some renown â excoriated him. He told Feist that a reporter can never know what a politician thinks, believes or feels. The reporter can only know what the politician says.
New York Times on gay Pakistan
Shock: Bishops decide to defend Catholic tradition!
Peter Beinart and the powerful, but voiceless, Jews of Atlanta
The New York Times published an interesting story about the Atlanta Jewish Book Festival (“Jewish Book Event in Atlanta Cancels Authorâs Talk on Zionism, and Uproar Follows“). It’s a great piece with the weirdest missing element. Here’s the top:
Red-state American in her natural habitat
I gotta admit: Just a few sentences into this Washington Post feature on post-election Red America and I was already worried.
Sun's celebration of brave, pro-gay marriage pastors
One of the big election-day stories in deep-blue, liberal Maryland was the narrow victory for same-sex marriage — especially since the polls were so close going into the final hours.
Are Salafis the most orthodox among Muslims?
The New York Times published a riveting piece about Salafism in Tunisia. From the beginning, the reader is transported to Kairouan:
What should be tweeted via @ThroneOfPeter?
Let’s drop the media criticism for a moment and have a bit of fun (about a topic that is actually pretty serious).
Is "marriage equality" our term, their's and everyone else's?
Back in May, I noticed a curious decision by some media outlets to scare quote the term “religious liberty.” Religion News Service defended the use of the scare quotes. Contributor Mark Silk had one defense and editor Kevin Eckstrom had another, writing:
