Yesterday we looked at some of this week’s worst examples of some major media’s trouble covering homosexuality or same-sex marriage. It was what I was thinking about as I ruminated on a first-person essay on TheAtlantic.com headlined:
Can the press cover traditionalists with justice and decency?
Thanks to the many readers who sent in kind words regarding my piece last week on the Washington Post ombudsman column that shed light on how bigoted some in the media are when it comes to covering those who oppose changing marriage laws to include same-sex couples.
Inside the History Channel's epic TV miniseries 'The Bible'
Way to go, Joe! Colorado civil-unions story hits the mark
In the interest of full disclosure, I should point out that Joe Hight, the relatively new editor of the Colorado Springs Gazette, is a longtime friend and mentor of mine.
Is Politico as partisan as The Weekly Standard?
Football, family and ... faith? That's a definite maybe
Why is the pope so old? (And other media questions)
A few days ago, the Washington Post tweeted out a link to a piece on its web site with the tease “Why is the pope always so old?” and a link to an article. Within moments, a bunch of people responded negatively to the tweet. I attached a screen shot here, but the comments included:
In a twist, vague evangelicals all oppose immigration reform
Once or twice or maybe even three times, I’ve complained about major media reporting that the nation’s evangelicals â all acting in lockstep â have jumped on an immigration reform bandwagon.
Bill Keller, et al, openly confess that "error has no rights"
As the debates rage on about you know what — Washington. Post. Ombudsman. Bias. Column. — I would like to jump in remind faithful GetReligion readers of an earlier episode in this post-journalism drama. I’ll also share another link or two pointing toward pieces in which journalists are discussing some of the prickly issues in the Patrick Pexton piece.
