I live in the same neighborhood as the U.S. Capitol where we will inaugurate Barack Obama as our next president. You would not believe the chaos — some real, some manufactured — as we head into this Tuesday. There are massive parking restrictions, road closures and bridge closures not to mention restrictions on what even pedestrians can carry within the security perimeter.
The mainstream media — including such heavyweights as the New York Times and Washington Post — reported that houses in D.C. could be rented for thousands of dollars each night. My neighbors report that they’ve either had no nibbles for their rental ads or have dropped their prices to a few hundred a night. But when I realized that the media had gotten those stories wrong, I wondered if they hadn’t served a ritual purpose. All cultures have chaos leading up to big parties and rites of passage. Think of Black Friday or your basic wedding craziness. Whether real or manufactured, there is clear cultural importance to having chaos leading up to this huge event.
There is, of course, a huge religion ghost here, although it’s a civil religion ghost. According to sociologist Robert Bellah, Americans embrace a common civil religion with certain fundamental beliefs, values, holidays, and rituals. These traits may be independent of, parallel to or integrated with people’s transcendent religious beliefs.
What’s so funny about civil religion is how it’s all around us but we never think consciously about it. We discuss the selection of inaugural clergy and the content of their prayers without putting it in the framework of civil religion. And we never think about whether civil religion has upsides and downsides, although, again, we skirt around these issues.
All of this to say that I was pleasantly surprised to come across a story in the Florida Times-Union devoted to the civil religious aspects of the inauguration. He compares the inauguration to a wedding or baptism.
Obama will be just another American citizen Tuesday morning. Tuesday night he will be the leader of one of the most powerful nations on earth. In between, he will undergo a status transformation through a rite of initiation.
“There has to be a ritual way of placing the mantle [of authority] on the person” becoming president, [religion scholar Julie] Ingersoll said. “This is how we legitimize them.”
Rites of initiation are rituals that initiate a person or community into a new reality, Ingersoll said. Such ceremonies establish and celebrate the shedding of an older life in favor of a new life and identity.
Prime examples include baptism and weddings.
The story has some major weaknesses. His definition of baptism is a bit esoteric. And it relies on only two sources.
Just as it is in weddings, who’s on the invite list sends a message.
By having white evangelist Rick Warren give the opening prayer and black minister and civil rights leader Joseph Lowery give the closing prayer, [associate professor of public policy at George Mason University Jeremy] Mayer said, Obama is sending a message he wants peace between the racial and religious branches of the American family.
I believe the word we’re looking for is “evangelical” as opposed to “evangelist.” The article looks at something related to what I described earlier — following the chaos we get “sacred time” with the setting apart of hours and days for special inaugural festivities. There’s also the notion of “sacred place” in Washington. And there’s more:
The inaugural parade will showcase iconic memorials and monuments - each of them sacred in American imagination. The reviewing stand will be in front of the White House. The swearing in occurs on the steps of the Capitol.
“It’s absolutely a civil religion moment,” Mayer said, referring to the concept of the merger of American patriotism and faith.
Even the stuff of the ceremony is sacred.
Presidents are sworn in by the chief justice of the Supreme Court - the chief guardian of the nation’s sacred Constitution - using a Bible.
Like I said, it’s a great idea for a story. It would probably help to distinguish some of the ordinary nature of civil rites from the more religious overtones. Everyone has rituals for transfer of power, that doesn’t always make them civil religion. The pressure to subvert religious distinctives while offering a prayer at a civic event might be more interesting. Or the tendency among many Americans to treat their favorite presidents as pastors-in-chief — or more — might make for a more interesting conversation as well. But a basic introduction to civil religion is necessary before we can plumb its depths.
|
| Posted at 12:43 pm | Print
| Permalink | Trackback |
Comments (9) |






January 15, 2009, at 12:57 pm
Steven Waldman of Beliefnet reported Monday that only Christian protestant clergy are participating in inaugural events: No Catholic, Jewish, Hindu, Muslim, etc clergy involved. Waldman posits that Obama messed up traditional American religious pluralism. He may have included black and gay protestant clergy but he forgot other faiths altogether.
January 15, 2009, at 1:03 pm
Peggy, we looked at Waldman’s story a few days ago. I believe there are a few other religions included as of latest notice, however.
January 15, 2009, at 1:04 pm
“By having white evangelist Rick Warren give the opening prayer and black minister and civil rights leader Joseph Lowery give the closing prayer…Obama is sending a message he wants peace between the racial and religious branches of the American family.”
Wow, what a truly groundbreaking act! Obama is all about Hope and Change and bringing us all together! Let’s just not bother to mention that Pres. Bush had a black minister give the benediction and a Hispanic reverend give the invocation at his 2005 inauguration, because we all know that Pres. Bush was a divisive hater…
January 15, 2009, at 1:06 pm
Mollie, sorry about missing it here. I was looking for an update, but hadn’t found one as of yet. Ray Arroyo today also claimed no Catholic or Jewish clergy were included. I’ll keep searching.
January 15, 2009, at 2:19 pm
It’s a very interesting article with a good point (I wrote my undergrad senior thesis on the use of civic rituals in Shakespeare’s romances, so it’s near to my heart), but I think the use of religious language is a bit overblown. No question, certain locales and events take on greater meaning during times like the inauguration, but “symbolic” would have been a better word choice than “sacred.” Also, the inclusion of inaugural parties was a stretch. Just because something is traditional doesn’t make it ritual. These parties aren’t exactly dances for the court of Louis the XIV.
January 15, 2009, at 2:29 pm
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hkHaP9MQJsgNUOuMtZ2kT8XFAMbAD95N4BU80
Muslim woman, rabbis to pray at inaugural service
(and Gene Robinson)
The whole issue of civil religion is worth more exploration as you suggested. A google news search of “civil religion” also popped up a VOA story http://voanews.com/en glish/2009-01-14-voa44.cfm that has the phrase in it although there was not much exploration:
January 15, 2009, at 2:52 pm
My understanding is that the only major religious group to be left out is the Roman Catholic Church. RC’s are 25% of the population. Obviously, a large subgroup are not practicing RCs.
I am not offended by this because Obama represents exactly the opposite of what the RCC holds to be true on life issues (abortion, certain kinds of stem cell research, euthanasia, etc). So there is a certain honesty about the lack of a RC “representative.”
January 16, 2009, at 3:38 pm
[…] invisible to us, as Mollie of Get Religion explained recently, our civil religion has fundamental beliefs, values, holidays, and rituals that […]
January 17, 2009, at 8:47 am
[…] the Prodigal, Dave Loveless shares his own personal experience with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder in part of a courageous effort to get those affected by mental illness of all sorts to come out of […]