GetReligion.org - GetReligion » “The press . . . just doesn’t get religion.” — William Schneider
member of beliefnet's blogheaven

adobe photoshop 8 downloads download cheap Adobe Dreamweaver CS5 adobe photoshop c2 online tutorial undo caps lock adobe photoshop download cheap Adobe Photoshop CS5 Extended adobe photoshop tv adobe creative suite 3 training download cheap Adobe Creative Suite 5 Master Collection adobe photoshop tutorials download adobe photoshop 5.0 free download cheap Adobe Creative Suite 5 Web Premium adobe creative suite 3 premium upgrade adobe photoshop cs 8 update download cheap Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 3 adobe photoshop cs authorization code generator
Recent Posts

Female Catholic priests, again | Why PCUSA won’t marry gays | Communion in a mineshaft? | Vanity Fair’s swing at Palin’s faith | One Nation, under Islam | Life and death of Mike/Christine | Ghosts in Lee’s green manifesto? | 5Q+1: Bruce Nolan, five years after Katrina | Got News? What’s a moderate Muslim? | Complex laws in Afghan stoning age | 2010 Archive >


Monday, October 15, 2007
Posted by tmatt

12marr600There he goes again.

I am sure that all of you GetReligion readers were caught up in the Hollywood excitement about the release of the latest film from one of the most daring and independent (and profitable) filmmakers of these times. What? You weren’t racing to the local multiplex to check out Why Did I Get Married? After all of that buildup in the mainstream press, like the screaming reviews and ads for Michael Clayton?

The Los Angeles Times seems to have been caught a bit off-guard as well:

In a competitive weekend at the box office, “Tyler Perry’s Why Did I Get Married?” outsold films featuring stars George Clooney, Joaquin Phoenix and Cate Blanchett and knocked “The Rock” out of first place.

Perry, an Atlanta-based filmmaker with a growing grass-roots following, scored his third No. 1 hit in four outings as his latest release took in a surprisingly strong $21.5 million … .

“Why Did I Get Married?” pushed Walt Disney Co.’s family comedy “The Game Plan,” starring Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson, to No. 2, with $11.5 million at U.S. and Canadian theaters. Based on Perry’s hit play, the PG-13 comedy drama about relationships and fidelity features a cast including Janet Jackson and the filmmaker himself.

And what was this surprise hit (trailer here) all about? This is how the folks who are pushing the film put it:

“My strong hunch is that this is the last time anybody will underestimate Tyler Perry,” Lions Gate President Tom Ortenberg said. “Tyler’s message of family values and personal redemption speaks very strongly to people who are not frequent moviegoers.”

Oh my gosh, cue the gospel music and prepare for theocracy.

The key is that Perry is pulling in a large audience of what might be called “nontraditional filmgoers” and, thus, it is hard for the experts to predict how his work will do at the box office. Apparently, it is also hard to write about this nontraditional filmmaker and his nontraditional (or is that “traditional?”) subject material. This is about all the Times can say in this news report, relying again on the studio executive to deliver the tough message.

Perry’s base is rooted in black churches, although it continues to expand.

Close to 90% of ticket buyers for the new film were African American, Ortenberg said. But the percentage of nonblack ticket buyers was the highest yet for a Perry film.

Ah, there is the story. We have, in recent years, seen an ocean of ink poured out on the subject of Hollywood’s attempts to reach the pew people who turned out to see The Passion of the Christ. Now, that movie pulled in large numbers of Hispanics and blacks, but everyone thought of it as a white megachurch blockbuster. The question, for me, is whether Perry is actually starting to reach an audience that can be defined more in terms of subject material than skin color.

If he does this, things could get very controversial. I mean, the other night — trying to fall asleep in a strange time zone — I finally saw all of Diary of a Mad Black Woman.

Holy smokes (literally). That has to be the most overtly Christian movie that I have ever seen from a “mainstream” operation. In terms of its faith language, that flick makes Tender Mercies look like a Woody Allen movie. If you go to Amazon.com and look at the comments left by consumers, you can tell that something in Perry’s work is getting people really turned on and really turned off (other than his strange mix of sentiment, wild humor and heavy drama), and I suspect it’s the faith element.

But some people do get it, or at least can see what is going on. I mean, check out the top of Jeannette Catsoulis’ New York Times review of Why Did I Get Married?:

The enormous success of Tyler Perry’s 2005 feature, “Diary of a Mad Black Woman,” was a surprise only to white America. For years the talented Mr. Perry has been entertaining African-American audiences with his sentimental and hugely popular stage plays, using a patented blend of Christian moralizing, social melodrama and rambunctious comedy. The jokes may have been broader than the rump of his monstrous alter ego, the matriarch Madea, but his evangelical drive and sound commercial instincts have found a home among audiences hungry for a theater of the spirit.

Hint, hint. This man is a story, folks. It’s a religion story.

Oh, and I loved the note at the end about the movie’s rating: “‘Why Did I Get Married?’ is rated PG-13 (Parents strongly cautioned.) Characters drink, commit adultery and generally behave like adults.”

Page Icon Posted at 9:45 am | Print Print | Permalink | Trackback | Comments (8)
divider

8 Responses to “The passion of Tyler Perry”

  1. Charlie Clauss says:

    Judging by the trailer, this well be a good film (and the fact that Janet Jackson looks really good won’t hurt!).

    I am glad that GR is keeping it’s eye on Hollywood. There would seem to be a strong connection between HW and the news media. Both are in business to make money and have the same relationship to broader culture.

    Neither HW nor the rest of media will like this movie, I think.

  2. Dennis Colby says:

    I kind of thought this was an old story. Salon did a pretty good article on it last year:

    http://www.salon.com/ent/feature/2006/02/23/perry/index_np.html

  3. Grandmother says:

    Did he also make, “Guess Who”? I’ve watched both movies for the first time in the last week. Excellent, both of them, and truly funny, and sad because they both hit on TRUTH..

    Recommended highly by

    Grandmother

  4. Ivan Wolfe says:

    Orson Scott Card (a science fiction author and Mormon) has a favorable review of why he thinks Perry is so successful:
    http://www.hatrack.com/osc/reviews/everything/2005-11-20.shtml

    excerpt:
    But so what? When I read Anna Karenina I’m also an onlooker, having never been Russian; you can’t escape immersion in Russian culture when you read Tolstoi. But it is precisely by reading Tolstoi (and Dostoevski, and Pasternak,) that you become familiar enough with Russian culture to appreciate the books. The same thing is true of reading Jane Austen, whose culture is every bit as foreign to us now, and yet whose books are still completely readable because they contain their own explanation.

    Tyler Perry performs the same service with his plays. If you enter the theatre white, you will leave just as white as you were — but with a sense of having lived, for a time, inside that rich culture of African-Americans, full of the outrageous, truth-telling, ironically-self-restrained humor that was born of centuries of oppression and controlled fury and solidarity.

    And one of the first things you realize is how deeply Christian this audience is. Oh, there are plenty of non-Christian blacks in America, and plenty of nominal, non-practicing Christians. But black culture is so steeped in Christianity that I doubt there are many native-born American blacks who aren’t perfectly comfortable with the prayer-songs, sermons, and gospel ecstasies that provide much of the heart and much of the humor in this and all of Tyler Perry’s plays.

    That’s why Perry is making millions in an era when so-called “mainstream” theatre has a hard time staying alive without government subsidies.

    But read the whole thing. It’s a review of a stage play, rather than the movies, but it’s still a good analysis of why Perry is successful.

  5. Roberto Rivera says:

    There’s another story here: the fact that African-American Christians are largely invisible to both the media and, truth be told, many of their white brethren. It isn’t only Tyler Perry who is underestimated — the African-American church is often underestimated and taken for granted by every side of the American culture wars.

    I guess that it shouldn’t be surprising that a Black Christian succeeded at integrating his beliefs and his art in a way that other Christians couldn’t since the histories of “mainstream” American Christianity and the Black Church are so divergent.

  6. Jason Pitzl-Waters says:

    “After all of that buildup in the mainstream press, like the screaming reviews and ads for Michael Clayton?”

    While Perry’s latest film didn’t get plastered everywhere like “Michael Clayton”, it was hardly ignored. An entire episode of “Oprah” was devoted to “Why Did I Get Married?” (which no doubt helped its opening numbers) so it certainly got more attention that several other similarly budgeted films.

  7. Alina says:

    I have to agree with comments two and six: this really isn’t a new story. The real story, as Roberto says, is how the black church is taken for granted by mainstream media.

  8. Paula Goodwin says:

    Can you tell me how I can purchase a tee-shirt? I would like the one that say “What do I do for you”. It’s on the play Family Reunion. Thanks