GetReligion.org - GetReligion » “The press . . . just doesn’t get religion.” — William Schneider
member of beliefnet's blogheaven
microsoft windows mail help Cheap Soft Downloads microsoft windows teraterm microsoft windows 2000 pro buy Cheap Soft Downloads :: Buy Microsoft Windows XP Professional SP3 microsoft windows daylight savings time download microsoft office standard 2003 key generator Cheap Soft Downloads :: Buy Microsoft Office Visio Professional 2007 price for microsoft office 2003 microsoft windows movie maker 1 Cheap Soft Downloads :: Buy Microsoft Windows 7 Professional microsoft windows xp system recovery help microsoft office word 2003 geting started Cheap Soft Downloads :: Buy Microsoft Windows Server 2008 Web Edition SP2 microsoft virtual pc windows98 installieren microsoft windows xp error 1402 Cheap Soft Downloads :: Buy Microsoft Office 2003 Professional microsoft sharepoint service windows 2000 logon

Recent Posts

Clearing one missionary’s name | Voo dat? | Problems with parachuting into AFA | Question: Who set all this up? | Superbowl morality tales | Shameless super plug for a friend | Godly gridiron giants | Southern Baptists should slow down? | Praying away Uganda’s anti-gay bill | On Haiti: Yo, Washington Post copy desk! | 2010 Archive >


Tuesday, October 4, 2005
Posted by tmatt

worship with hands raisedReligion test? What religion test?

Right now, it seems that everyone in America — blue zones as well as red — is doing everything possible to probe the religious views of one Harriet Miers.

President George W. Bush is, of course, sending every faith-based signal that he can about his pal without actually speaking any of the radical words that will turn country-club Republicans into pillars of salt. And, yes, it’s crucial that the Powers That Be at The New York Times recognize that the heart of this revolt is among “social conservatives.” This is code language, of course, for people in pews. Meanwhile, conservative journalist Fred Barnes is offering a “calm down, church people” analysis over at The Weekly Standard, after the celebrated Bill Kristol outcry yesterday.

So has anyone out there been able to locate a video of Miers speaking in tongues or something really damning? An audiotape for NPR? Not so far.

This story resides in the home turf of The Dallas Morning News so that newspaper is working hard on the God angle, which, of course, is almost the same thing as the abortion angle (especially in places like Texas). The result is a story by Dave Levinthal and a pack of researchers that is built on the testimony of Lorlee Bartos, a former campaign operative for Miers in the 1989 race for the Dallas City Council. Let’s cut to the chase:

“She is on the extreme end of the anti-choice movement,” said Lorlee Bartos, who managed Ms. Miers’ first and only political campaign and said they discussed abortion once during the race. Ms. Bartos said Ms. Miers was supportive of abortion rights in her youth. She said Ms. Miers then underwent “a born-again, profound experience” that caused her to oppose abortion. Beyond their exchange in 1989, Ms. Bartos said she has no other insight into Ms. Miers’ views on abortion.

At this point, things get a bit confusing and hard to trace. The News has a bit of a story buried in here and does not seem to know what to do with it. Come to think of it, it would help to have some facts to prove this story. While everyone is searching for pro-life or evangelism links on the home page of the Valley View Christian Church, the News says that Miers and a minister friend are involved in a new church-planting project. Really?

Ron Key, who has been Ms. Miers’ pastor since the early 1980s, said his church is anti-abortion. Mr. Key, who recently left Valley View Christian Church to found a new church with Ms. Miers and others, stopped short, however, of saying that those beliefs would color her approach to the law. “The Constitution would be her major influence, I’m sure,” he said.

His church? Which church is Key’s church? It may seem like much ado about nothing to outsiders, but my experience — as a reporter and as a churchman — is that there are often interesting reasons for the birth of new churches, especially when a pastor has been at one major church for a long time and then leaves to start a new church in the same area. Does the News have any information on this? Also, starting a church is hard work. What does it mean that Ms. Miers is somehow involved in starting this new congregation? Let’s hope there is a follow-up story here.

Meanwhile, my friend Jim Dahlman at Milligan College has tipped his hat toward a feature or two about Miers and the ties that bind her to the world of Independent Christian Churches. The New York Times of that non-denominational body (don’t ask, it’s too complicated) is called The Christian Standard and it has a quick and simple story up about Miers and Valley View and the text of another “Inside the Real West Wing” story from 2004.

It is interesting to note that, in the online update, the pastor identified with Miers is the current leader at Valley View Christian Church, and there is no word of Ron Key and the new congregation in the works. Interesting.

“Harriet is just an outstanding Christian woman,” said Barry McCarty, preaching minister with Valley View Christian Church. “She is very well respected in the city of Dallas and well loved by the people in our church.”

Meanwhile, that feature from 2004 offers this kind of soft-edged religious language, which is par for the course in church publications. These passages will probably sound rather different when read during a U.S. Senate hearing by a NARAL Pro-Choice leader who wants to terrify the loyal people who write checks for her organization. We can also expect to hear this soon, in a different tone of voice, on religious talk radio.

You may select the tone of your choosing when reading the next few paragraphs:

Miers is a woman of faith with strong Christian beliefs. To her, it has been “wonderful to be working for a president who is a believer and who acts on his faith.” The president talks about his faith often, and it is important to him. It also is important to Miers. She brings her faith to bear on everything she does. It’s not only a part of how she views issues, it also affects her willingness to serve and her desire to do well. She readily acknowledges that she can’t do anything without the grace of God.

Service, responsibility, duty, sacrifice, and faith are words integral to understanding Harriet Miers and her colleagues. She describes the Bush team as “an administration where faith is important. Prayers count. We all value prayers.” She says that everyone can make a difference — “by your vote, by writing, by doing something that is demonstrable, whether it’s in school,” or out in the community. Empowerment is real, and individual people are able to change the course of history.”

That last sentence is especially true of judges who sit on the U.S. Supreme Court for a decade or two.

So does anyone out there have a URL for a photo of Miers praying with her hands in the air? Just asking.

  • Share/Bookmark
Page Icon Posted at 3:04 pm | Print Print | Permalink | Trackback | Comments (9)
divider

9 Responses to “Probing the faith of Ms. Miers”

  1. Michael says:

    Is it also fair to say that since the White House has gone out of its way to show that she’s a good Christian woman to appease the religious right that she can also be asked questions about her faith during confirmation hearings.

    It seems only fair since being a solid, born-again Christian was what is supposed to appease the “culture of life” crowd that it should also be the source of questions during the hearing. If you make it a litmus test for the grassroots, seems like it is fair game.

  2. Avram says:

    Terry, as I understand it, the “no religious Test” clause was included to prohibit something like the British Test Acts, which barred from office Catholics, religious nonconformists, and anyone else who wasn’t Church of England.

    I think it’s a mistake to see it as banning inquiry about a beliefs a nominee has that might bear on how he or she will perform his or her job.

    If two nominees hold the same belief (one that’s relevent to the office), one deriving it from secular principles while the other holds it for religious reasons, do you see it as permissable to ask the first nominee about the belief but not the second?

  3. ceemac says:

    A question I have pndered that is related to faith and the Supreme Court.

    Has anyone ever done a reliable survey on the question of what Cultural Conservatives actually want the Supreme Court to do with Roe.
    *How many want Roe overturned and the question returned to the states.
    *How many want abortion declared unconstitutional by the court.

  4. Todd says:

    ceemac,

    As a Cultural Conservative, I would like to see the question returned to the states. I do not think that the matter will ever be resolved through the courts. It will require a messy and at times difficult debate within each of the fifty state legislatures before a resolution to this issue that most people can live with can be reached.

  5. ceemac says:

    Todd,

    I have heard individual cultural conservatives advocate each of positions. Tahts is why I am wondering is a survey has been done that will show what the percentages for each position are.

  6. Bloggernacle Times » The Faith of Ms. Miers says:

    […] Over at Get Religion, T. Mattingly has a nice overview of several stories touching on the religious statements or views of the new Supreme Court nominee, Harriet Miers. One story has her on “the extreme end of the anti-choice movement”; the quote dates from 1989 and sounds like how a pro-lifer describes a pro-choicer. Her minister is quoted describing her as “an outstanding Christian woman.” As a whole, the post makes it harder to understand why the conservative right is making noise about the current nomination and the liberal left is, for the moment, rather quiet about it. As long as you’re over at GR, go read another post about Ms. Miers, Pres. Bush, and jumping the shark (a new phrase for me). […]

  7. Chip Chillington says:

    Terry asked, ‘His church? Which church is Key’s church? It may seem like much ado about nothing to outsiders, but my experience — as a reporter and as a churchman — is that there are often interesting reasons for the birth of new churches, especially when a pastor has been at one major church for a long time and then leaves to start a new church in the same area.’

    Today’s Washington Post answers some of these questions http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/04/AR2005100401765_2.html

    ‘Those beliefs were forged at Valley View, but Miers is breaking away from the church where she embraced Jesus. In recent years, church elders have moved to cut back on missionary work, sparking a split this summer among the parishioners. Key is forming a church that plans to donate half its revenues to mission work, and Miers plans to join him.

    “These days so many of the churches have become Christian country clubs,” Key said. “They are more about making you feel good about yourself than making you grow. Some of us, including Harriet, were uncomfortable with all this.”’

    Chip

  8. Mark says:

    I much prefer the New York Times’ story (http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/05/politics/politicsspecial1/05miers.html?hp&ex=1128571200&en=7e04971063f63746&ei=5094&partner=homepage) on Miers’ faith to the Post. Much more substantive and much less condescending.

  9. Ann Rodgers says:

    No one is likely to produce footage of Ms. Miers either speaking in tongues or praying with her hands in the air because her wing of the Christian Church is (to the best of my recollection, and I once knew someone from Valley View quite well) fervently anti-charismatic. The more conservative wing of the Campbellite tradition holds that speaking in tongues was a gift to the early church that ceased to be valid after the last book of the canon was completed. (Pat Boone was essentially excommunicated from the Churches of Christ, a closely related Campbellite group, after he became charismatic). The exception to this would be if the alleged new church that she is alleged to have helped to plant was a charismatic split from Valley View …