This is the headline on a Washington Post story published today:
GOP hopeful Rick Santorum campaigns with a seriously ill daughter at home
My first thought: You’re kidding — Santorum’s still in the race!?
My second thought: What a jerk!
Then I decided to read past the editorialized title and see what the story had to say. The Lifestyle piece opens this way:
SIOUX CITY, IOWA — At the lectern in a packed convention center last month, Rick Santorum spoke haltingly, not for the first or the last time, about his seriously ill youngest daughter, Isabella , who has the genetic disorder Trisomy 18. Half of all children with the chromosomal anomaly, more common in girls, are stillborn. And of those who do survive, only one in 10 makes it to her first birthday.
“I have a little girl who’s 31/2 years old,” the Republican presidential hopeful said in his dinner speech at the annual “Defenders of Freedom” event, hosted by Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa). “I don’t know whether her life is going to be measured — it’s always been measured — in days and weeks. Yet here I am” — on the road so often, he was the first of the current GOP contenders to visit all 99 Iowa counties. Why? “Because I feel like I wouldn’t be a good dad if I wasn’t out here fighting for a country that would see the dignity in her and every other child.”
His is easily the most searing personal narrative offered by any candidate this season. And when he speaks of Bella publicly, it is almost always in conjunction with his top policy goal of dismantling the health-care reform legislation, which he sees as a threat to those like her, “on the margins of life.”
Amazingly enough, the 1,400-word profile attempts to tackle Santorum’s personal and political motivations without a single mention of faith or abortion.
In the online version, the Post even links in the opening paragraph to the YouTube video embedded with this post. In that video, Santorum prefaces his remarks about his daughter by citing his authorship of the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act.
The story makes vague reference to Santorum’s “life” platform:
The point of his run, and indeed his whole political career, he said, is “to open people’s eyes to things they maybe haven’t thought through. I don’t think most Americans think through life.”
But nowhere does the story explore the role of religion as it relates to Santorum’s daughter and his presidential run — or question whether his decision to campaign bolsters or undermines his reputation as a candidate of faith. (For those new to the GetReligion party, we refer to this gap in coverage as a religion ghost.)
A quick Google search turned up a recent McClatchy story on Santorum. That headline (with a slightly different slant than the Post):
Santorum keeps faith at forefront in his GOP presidential nomination campaign
From that story:
But it was his narrative about 3-year-old daughter Bella that brought him and his audience near tears.
Born premature and profoundly disabled, she almost died twice.
“I look at Bella … and just love her unconditionally,” Santorum said, then added, “That’s how the Father looks at me.”
“That’s right,” a woman responded to his allusion to God.
When he meets with pastors, Santorum points to Time magazine’s decision to list him, in 2005, as one of the 25 most influential evangelicals in America for leading fights on Capitol Hill against abortion and same-sex marriage.
“And I’m not an evangelical,” said Santorum, who’s Catholic. Evangelicals are Protestants who emphasize a personal “born-again” experience, evangelism and a literal reading of the Bible.
Yet the only hint from the Post story that faith might play a role in Santorum’s life and campaign comes in a passing reference at the very end:
It was late by then, and the candidate hoped, he said, to check in with his family before grabbing a few hours’ sleep, then heading off to an early morning Mass and another full day of campaign events.
Ghosts, anyone?
|
| Posted at 1:46 pm | Print
| Permalink | Trackback |
Comments (8) |







November 30, 2011, at 5:11 pm
Just a reminder to keep comments focused on journalism, not personal political preferences.
Like or Dislike:
2
0
November 30, 2011, at 6:18 pm
The ghost is indeed there.
And while I’m happy that the McClatchy story did contain religion, I was troubled by what can be a misleading phrase:
Correct me if I’m wrong, but I thought that evangelicals don’t read the entire Bible literally but read it faithfully, taking those sections which they believe should be taken literally as literal truth but also reading those sections that are clearly meant as parables as parables and so forth? Isn’t this so?
Like or Dislike:
2
1
November 30, 2011, at 6:35 pm
I would say roughly half the time when GR posts a story citing a ghost, I feel that they are seeing a ghost where there isn’t one. But not this time. It’s clear that Rick Santorum’s faith encompasses not just him as a person but his actions as a politician that it seems silly to go without even a brief mention of it.
Like or Dislike:
3
0
November 30, 2011, at 9:01 pm
Good question, Jerry, on “literal reading.” I did a recent Christianity Today piece that touched on that issue. Short version: Some evangelicals seem to take the Bible more literally than others.
Mike, glad you saw a ghost this time. Strange that you don’t always see them.
Like or Dislike:
2
0
November 30, 2011, at 9:03 pm
OK, Jerry, I’ve been up too many hours today: I read right over your reference to “parables.” I’d think you’re exactly right there. Sorry I read too quickly …
Like or Dislike:
1
0
November 30, 2011, at 10:12 pm
Desperate to get any attention in the GOP campaign for the nomination, Santorum put out to this story wanting to use his family to gain publicity for political sympathy and pointing out his strong pro-life credentials. We should not be surprised that the Washington Post choose to interpret the story by reflecting on Santorum’s family values of being absent with a gravely ill child at home. Newspapers don’t have to regurgitate the spin candidates are coughing up.
I really don’t see why the Washington Post need mention Santorum’s religion again. Santorum wants to be the leader of a secular democracy, he’s not running for pope for some theocracy. The Washington Post was doing Santorum a favor and not dwelling constantly on his religion. If Santorum’s only gimmick is to appeal to Christian conservatives, then we can assume he’s not serious about running in the general election. While Santorum might really be auditioning for the VP slot or at best a talk show on CBN, newspapers are not required to interpret candidate press releases verbatim.
Hot debate. What do you think?
2
15
December 1, 2011, at 5:10 pm
Santorum is a Catholic, not an Evangelical. Catholics don’t adhere to literal translation of the entire Bible. From earliest times, the Church has noted parables, allegories, poetry, colloquialisms, histories, etc.
Like or Dislike:
3
0
December 2, 2011, at 10:56 am
I think that is a mean response, Gary, whether you meant it or not.
Please consider the forum where the remarks were made; they were perfectly suited to the occasion.
While I do not consider Santorum a viable (get the pun?) candidate for the presidency, at least he has the guts to stand up and be counted among real defenders of life, in, partially removed, and out of the womb.
Please temper your political anger.
Peace.
Like or Dislike:
3
1