The monstrous, history-making events in northern Iraq can overwhelm reporters and audiences alike, as our own tmatt noted a few days ago. But rather surprisingly, coverage has broadened in breadth and depth and enterprise.
A huge variety of outlets -- from Time to Vox to Fox to the BBC to The Guardian to Al-Arabiya to the New York Daily News -- have weighed in with coverage, analysis and background. They're not all equally good, of course.
An outstanding example of perspective is in the Washington Post, where veteran reporter Terrence McCoy examines the reasons for the brutal, merciless warfare waged by the Islamic State. He cites several sources who say that the crucifixions, beheadings and mass killings are no mere battlefield excesses -- they were planned as tools to paralyze some people, polarize others.
One of the more fearsome excerpts: