GetReligion.org - GetReligion » “The press . . . just doesn’t get religion.” — William Schneider
member of beliefnet's blogheaven

Recent Posts

Pod people: Birth control or religious liberty? | LA Times fails to draw religious blood | Media genuflect before Church of Planned Parenthood | Eight GetReligion comments after eight years | Media discover Planned Parenthood is controversial | See no evil, report no evil | College newspaper in the rough | A disconnect, a webcam, suicide and ink | One baptism, for the remission of sins | Parading atheistic ignorance | 2012 Archive >


Friday, July 23, 2010
Posted by Bobby Ross Jr.
Share

In the world of news, three is a magical number.

One is ordinary. Two is coincidence. But three is a growing trend — be it three teenagers with nose rings, three soccer moms supporting the same political candidate or three pastors tweeting from the pulpit.

Increasingly, journalists are using this reporting device in religion stories, as evidenced by three articles published just this week:

Churches making mainstream films to attract souls, by USA Today.

For weight-loss help, faithfuls turn to God, by CNN. (Not sure I’ve ever seen “faithfuls” as a plural before.)

Hospitals revamp chapels into interfaith meditation rooms, by Religion News Service.

The USA Today story, by Godbeat pro and GetReligion favorite Cathy Lynn Grossman, opens this way:

ALBANY, Ga. — Praise the Lord and pass the popcorn.

Moviemaking churches are venturing into the cineplex to attract souls who might never set foot in a megachurch.

Like Hollywood films, they take on real-life issues in dramatic packages:

— A resentful white cop and his black partner struggle with race and fatherhood before taking a lesson in reconciliation from Oscar winner Lou Gossett Jr. in a cameo role. That’s The Grace Card, underwritten by an optometrist for his small church in Tennessee.

— An aimless 20-year-old, adventuring with his buddies in India, discovers the global horror of sex slavery and makes it his life-changing cause. That’s Not Today, backed by a California Quaker church.

— Cops facing rough times on the streets realize their real failures are at home — as fathers who don’t know, or don’t care, how to truly love their kids. That’s Courageous, the fourth film from Sherwood Baptist Church, which is so successful in its moviemaking ministry that it now coaches others.

Let’s see. That’s one, two, three examples.

The story includes a quote portraying movies as “the stained-glass windows of the 21st century.” Yet there’s no hard data, no concrete evidence to support the idea that this is a major trend among larger churches. Rather, it seems to be an approach taken by a few.

At the same time, the lede’s suggestion that “churches are venturing into the cineplex to attract souls who might never set foot in a megachurch” does not seem to be supported by the rest of the story. Instead, the evidence points toward the movies touching people who already claim the Christian faith. The piece lacks input from anyone — if such a person exists — who has seen one of these movies and turned to Jesus Christ.

That said, it really is an interesting story with some nice statistics and details on Christian moviemaking.

The CNN story, meanwhile, takes the approach that three anecdotes is not enough. Seeming almost to rapid-fire results from a “faith” and “fitness” Google search, it starts like this:

(CNN) — Hallelujah diets. Body by God. Karate for Christ. Gospel groove workouts.

Using the Lord’s name (not in vain), fitness and diet enthusiasts are injecting the Almighty into nutrition programs, exercise DVDs, martial arts and healthy living courses.

In a DVD released in June, a gospel choir in full-length gowns sways back and forth while a fitness personality, Donna Richardson Joyner, sashays to her aerobic exercises. Her smiling, spandex-clad entourage echoes her movements. All lift their hands to praise the Lord.

“Give him some love!” she shouts. “Honor him!”

Exercise DVDs with religious themes, such as this one, have streamed into the market. More churches have opened fitness centers and started healthy living groups.

That final paragraph is the nut graf — the “why I should care” sentence that explains why this is news. However, the story never tells how many exercise DVDs with religious themes have been sold. It never provides any real numbers on churches opening fitness centers and starting healthy living groups. Instead, it strings together anecdotes — compelling ones that whisper to my skeptical side, “Yeah, there could be a trend here. But please give me some better evidence to prove it.”

The CNN story ends this way:

The faith-based fitness movement reaches a demographic that might have otherwise avoided the gym.

“When you look at something religion-based, you’re getting a community together who have people with common beliefs and principles, it might be easier to be adhere to that,” he said.

That seems to be saying that people of faith are less likely to go to the gym than others? Really? Do share more. (Of course they didn’t.)

Like the USA Today and CNN pieces, the RNS story relies mainly on anecdotal evidence to prove that hospital chapels are becoming more diverse to serve a multicultural society with people of many faiths:

The shift to meditation rooms mirrors a growing trend among hospitals nationwide as health care centers try to make room for people from a wide variety of faiths, as well as those who have no faith or are “spiritual but not religious.”

In a stressful environment, hospital chapels, meditation rooms or prayer rooms offer employees, patients and visitors quiet refuge for individual prayer, meditation or communal worship.

Throughout the 19th century, many U.S. hospitals were built by religious groups, particularly Catholic nuns. As a result, their chapels typically resembled Protestant or Catholic churches or Jewish synagogues.

Today, hospital chapels vary widely. Some still reflect their founders’ religious roots. Others have been renovated to accommodate multiple religions, or their religious symbols have been removed so the rooms resemble waiting rooms or art galleries.

Actually, I thought the RNS story was pretty good — including quoting a sociology professor who has visited about 30 chapels nationwide and offered an educated perspective on the broader picture. But I needed a third example to prove my point, and that was the best I could find in a hurry.

In all seriousness, I understand the “magic of three.” I have used that trend-story-formula myself and undoubtedly will again. But I think journalists — myself included — would do well to remember that counting to three does not qualify as scientific research.

I’d love to hear GetReligion readers’ perspectives on this topic. When making your points, however, please remember to include examples. I don’t have to tell you how many.

Page Icon Posted at 3:40 pm | Print Print | Permalink | Trackback | Comments (9)
divider

9 Responses to “The magic of three”

  1. Martha says:

    “Moviemaking churches are venturing into the cineplex to attract souls who might never set foot in a megachurch.”

    This is news? It’s been going on since at least the time Ed Wood was raising funding for his masterpiece (ahem) “Plan Nine From Outer Space”:

    http://mst3k.wikia.com/wiki/Edward_D._Wood_Jr.

    “To finance Plan Nine, Wood turned to a Baptist minister named J. Edward Reynolds, who saw the film as an opportunity to get into the movie business and use the profits to finance a series of religious films. In return, Wood agreed to have the cast and crew baptized by Reynolds prior to production.”

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

  2. Ray Ingles says:

    That seems to be saying that people of faith are less likely to go to the gym than others?

    Actually, it’s hard to tell what they meant by that. It might be that they were implying that the mutual-support aspect of faith communities might help people sustain a habit of exercise/healthy eating/whatever.

    Whatever their point was, I agree it wasn’t expressed well.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1

  3. Cathy Grossman says:

    Ha! Let me see: My lead is a cliche, you think I claim a trend (which I don’t — just describe the activities of the churches that do this) and you find holes in the data despite the box office numbers and context on ticket sales.
    Magic! Three points of criticism!
    It works for bloggers, too.
    Ah well, glad to know I’m still a God beat fave with you folks.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1

  4. Bobby says:

    My lead is a cliche.

    Actually, I didn’t mean to insinuate that. I thought the lede was quite creative (“Praise the Lord and pass the popcorn”).

    I did say that it’s “an interesting story with some nice statistics and details on Christian moviemaking.”

    To me, the headline on the story (“Churches making mainstream films to attract souls”) indicates a “trend” piece, as do the first two grafs.

    In any case, you do remain a fave, and you get extra points for the “Three points of criticism!” line.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1

  5. Dave says:

    Bobby, I’ve tried to re-read your critique of Grossman’s piece in light of her comment, and my eyes glazed over. Can you tell me, in one sentence, what’s wrong with her piece in the GR frame of reference?

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1

  6. Karen Vaughan says:

    The faith-based fitness movement reaches a demographic that might have otherwise avoided the gym.

    That seems to be saying that people of faith are less likely to go to the gym than others? Really?

    I think it says that people of faith who might otherwise avoid the gym may have enough additional motivation by finding a religious imperative and a chance to praise God.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1

  7. Bobby says:

    Bobby, I’ve tried to re-read your critique of Grossman’s piece in light of her comment, and my eyes glazed over. Can you tell me, in one sentence, what’s wrong with her piece in the GR frame of reference?

    Dave, realize that I’m one small cog in the GR army. So I’ll speak on behalf of my personal “GR frame of reference.” My colleagues may totally disagree with me in the case of this specific post.

    My concern was that the piece had a headline and opening two sentences that presented it, in my opinion, as a “trend” piece on churches making movies as an evangelistic tool. But only three anecdotal examples are given, and the soul-saving angle isn’t fully explored.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1

  8. Dave says:

    Bobby, thank you!

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1

  9. Jettboy says:

    I think it stems from journalism schools teaching that you need at least three people quoted to make a good story, more if you can. Most reporters stick with at least three people unless a longer piece. Go ahead, read any random news story and on average I’ll bet you’ll find this the case. The point is that journalists take this too far and come to the conclusion that three makes it sound like statistical trend because there is no way they would ever do, or be able to do, a proper survey. That too much time and money that journalists don’t have with a deadline looming that will help them keep the job and pay the bills.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0