GetReligion.org - GetReligion » “The press . . . just doesn’t get religion.” — William Schneider
member of beliefnet's blogheaven

Recent Posts

Old Catholics vs. the pope | Didn’t CNN fact check the holy popsicles? | Slow-pitch screamer on the Godbeat | In the end, Summer worked hard for her Lord | Same-sex marriage, celebration and “core values” | Has Time printed the worst Anglican article ever? | That Gray Lady Catholic same-sex unions scoop 2.0 | Gay marriage and the French Catholic vote | Pacquiao, homosexuality, tolerance and reading comprehension | Bishops threaten lawsuit over HHS mandate | 2012 Archive >


Thursday, November 19, 2009
Posted by tmatt
Share

axe-and-chopping-blockEvery now and then, the avid news reader clicks on a link or opens up a newspaper and is faced with something so strange that it simply cannot be comprehended. As we have seen recently, this seems to happen quite often in MSM coverage of religion.

So here we go again.

This bizarre Associated Press story, as sent to us by a faithful reader in Pittsburgh, is quite short. Thus, let me share — brace yourself — the whole thing:

PHILADELPHIA — An animal welfare official says a beheaded dog and cat found in Philadelphia appear to be the result of a ritual sacrifice.

George Bengal, Pennsylvania Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals director of investigations, said the dog and cat were found … near a bike path in Philadelphia’s Olney neighborhood along with three beheaded chickens. He said he believes the animals were killed elsewhere and the remains dumped where a passer-by found them.

Mr. Bengal said there is usually an increase in ritual animal sacrifices at this time of year because of “a lot of high holidays that different groups celebrate.”

But he said most of those sacrifices involve goats and chickens.

Say what? Let’s read that quote again, the one in which it is claimed that the number of ritual animal sacrifices spike at this time of year because of “a lot of high holidays that different groups celebrate.”

Now, it is true that this strangeness takes inside quotation marks so, on one level, AP is off the hook. But what in the world are these words supposed to mean? Are we to believe that there is a wave of beheaded animal corpses because of (a) the arrival of Advent/Nativity Lent, (b) approaching observances of Hanukkah, (c) Kwanzaa festivities, (d) some alleged connection to Solstice? Is the goal to link this to voodoo or something?

But before you go there, please note that the story says absolutely nothing that would point toward Santeria and, even if it did, there is no discussion of whether these sacrifices in any way fit patterns of worship in that tradition. You see, it’s wrong for journalists to say, “Behold, beheaded animals. Those Santeria people are at it again.” That’s too simplistic.

So let me ask the obvious question and ask readers to weigh in: Precisely what “high holidays” are we supposed to assume are being discussed here? I honestly do not have a clue.

What does this strange sentence mean? Just asking.

Page Icon Posted at 8:46 pm | Print Print | Permalink | Trackback | Comments (8)
divider

8 Responses to “Holy high holidays!”

  1. Lori Pieper says:

    Turkeys? I mean it’s awfully close to Thanksgiving. But that’s not generally regarded as a ritual religious slaughter.

    I honestly don’t think the reporter had any idea of what the words were supposed to mean. Nor did the guy who said it.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  2. MattK says:

    Wow? If I’d heard that I would have had afollow-up question or ten. I bet this reporter did, too. I think this deformed story must be laid at the feet of an editor who had to juggle some serious space constraints.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  3. Dave says:

    Terry, this is the kind of coverage neoPagans have come to expect from the MSM when mutilated animal remains are found. It’s a broken record (if I’m not dating myself too much with that metaphor).

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  4. tmatt says:

    DAVE:

    What is your take on the questions that journalists SHOULD have asked about this scene, this event?

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  5. Carlos says:

    Poor journalism,the writer and editors choise to quote the city official statement is sensationalist at best.The scope of the article permeates a prejudice in the part of the city officer and implied endorsement by the writer and editor who leave it at that.
    Unfortunate ,in a city of multiple creeds and faiths.Offensive for its bias tone .

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  6. Dave says:

    Terry, if the community is multicultural enough to have practitioners of Afro-Caribbean paths, at least one reporter should be familiar enough with that scene to know whom in it to ask about any animal findings.

    In any event, the reporter should ask any police official or “expert” what evidence they have if they assert a connection to Santeria or whatever. The same as if the official had blamed Jews or Catholics or Masons.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  7. kristy says:

    I hope the reporter DID ask more questions of Mr. Bengal.Simple ones, like,”Oh, what high holidays do you mean?” and, “Which groups celebrate those holidays?” As it stands, it either shouldn’t have been run as a news tidbit with that quote, or should have been run with additional questions asked and answered in the story.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  8. Steven @ bike holidays says:

    The first thing that springs to mind is teenagers playing pranks, and I hope these animals were dead to begin with. If it’s a serious nut job who is doing it then this is a very cruel act that needs to be stopped and punished.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0