The smart folks over at Harvard University came out with their report on how to overhaul the general education curriculum, more commonly known as the core curriculum. As expected, the requirement asking students to study religion as a particular subject was dropped.
I found it curious that The Boston Globe ignored the religious angle until the ninth paragraph, but that did not stop the Associated Press and Reuters from proclaiming that the subject of religion would be included in the curriculum, just not as previously proposed. If you’re confused about the difference, you’re not alone. As best I can tell, the members of the committee found it best to tuck religious studies into a broader category:
An earlier proposal would have made Harvard unique among its elite Ivy League peers by requiring undergraduates to study religion as a distinct subject, but that was dropped in December.
The changes to the general-education requirements, imposed on students outside their major, still address religious beliefs and practices. Study of those issues, however, would be folded into a broader subject of “culture and belief.”
How is this different from what Harvard has now? Neither article told us, but I’m told that under the existing curriculum students had to take a class under the category of Moral Reasoning, which included some courses about religion but others that were closer to secular philosophy.
After my first post on the issue, reader Eric Chaffee asked why Moral Reasoning was dumped. That’s a good question reporters haven’t really answered. My impression is that the university is making the change for the sake of change, but it is definitely worth following up on.
What is most interesting in the AP and Reuters stories on the report is this fact:
“Harvard is a secular institution but religion is an important part of our students’ lives,” it said. It noted that 94 percent of Harvard’s incoming students report that they discuss religion “frequently” or “occasionally,” and 71 percent say that they attend religious services.
While that is a rather vague stat, one has to wonder how it compares with other secular universities. There is a story to tell about the status of religion at Harvard, and I’ll be waiting for someone to tell it.
 | Posted at 5:18 pm |  Print
| Permalink | Trackback |
Comments (5) |
February 8, 2007, at 8:46 pm
So 94% of Harvard students have enough interest to frequently discuss religion. But Harvard, a school originally founded to train Protestant ministers, can’t bring itself to make sure that their students have more than a high school knowledge of religion—any religion. Thus proving again that modern secularism —which reigns on so many “elite” universities, is merely the current version of 19th Century anti-Catholic “Know-Nothingism” applied to all religions on the academic level.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
February 8, 2007, at 10:10 pm
Just after the line in the report about Harvard as a secular institution, the authors go further, writing of “the resolutely secular world of the academy.” Would that describe Wheaton, Calvin, Baylor, or Notre Dame? Or perhaps the Harvard Div School?
For my money, there’s plenty in the report to suggest that its authors don’t “get religion,” except in a purely anthropological sense, a sense, by the way, that isn’t subject to the same kind of interrogation that (almost) everything else is.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
February 9, 2007, at 12:49 am
You really know how to write a post. For the second time today, google has honored getReligion with a top slot. This time in my ‘religion’ section:
The Harvard way of getting religion
GetReligion - 7 hours ago
Congratulations.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
February 11, 2007, at 7:18 pm
Deacon John, you’re almost there; the big H wants to make sure they *don’t* learn any religious subject. That might explain why so often one discusses faith with an otherwise educated person, only to discover the third grader within. That was the last time their grandmother dragged them to Sunday school, and there their education on the matter ended at that point. It’s pretty strange to see, but easy to explain. Clearly one will have to explain some matters to a Harvard man very, very slowly.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
February 13, 2007, at 1:33 pm
Bob,
That is a FANTASTIC observation on “the third grader within.”
VERY true!
Excellent point
Larry
Like or Dislike:
0 
0