The British continue to be haunted by reports of terrorist plots. However, there was an important twist in one of the recent stories and, ever since, I have been watching to see if journalists will dig into a crucial detail.
At first glance, this was just another plot to kidnap, torture and behead someone identified by Islamists as an enemy of the faith. Here is the top of one of the basic U.S. reports, taken from The New York Times:
The British police conducted a series of raids … arresting nine suspects on terrorism charges in what appeared to be a shift in the tactics of terrorism in Britain. The suspects are accused of devising a plot that included plans to kidnap, torture and behead a British Muslim soldier and broadcast video images of his killing on the Internet.
The arrests, in the central city of Birmingham, were part of what the authorities called a major operation involving hundreds of officers after months of preparation. Eight suspects were arrested in eight different homes, and a ninth was seized on a highway near the city, the police said. Four businesses were also searched.
According to the report, the planned use of the Internet was a “marked departure from previous terrorist plots.”
Really? Since when?
I was struck by a detail that drew little attention in this story and many others. It has received little or no follow-up attention, in and of itself. I refer to the fact that the terrorists planned to behead a Muslim soldier who is serving in the British Army and, therefore, has become an enemy of Islam in their eyes.
This is a crucial point that many in the West fail to realize, a point that has been researched by my Oxford Centre colleague Dr. Paul Marshall. When it comes to the wrath of Islamists, no one is in more danger than a Muslim who is viewed as a supporter of Western freedoms and values. Here is a piece of a column I wrote about one of Marshall’s lectures, after we taught together in Oxford last summer:
… Islamists are using laws against apostasy and blasphemy to threaten liberal Muslims just as often, or more often, than against actual converts. When Osama bin Laden issues pronouncements against blasphemy, he reserves his strongest words for Muslims who want to compromise with the West.
There is no law higher for Muslims than Sharia law and no courts higher than those that enforce it. One notorious law in Pakistan says: “Whoever, by words either spoken or written, or by visible representation, or by imputation, innuendo or insinuation, directly or indirectly, defiles the sacred name of the Holy Prophet Mohammad (peace be upon him) shall be punished by death.”
In the wake of the latest alleged plot, the British tab called The People did feature one interesting follow-up that showed some of the tensions inside the Muslim community nearby. In this case, a television reporter secretly filmed a sermon rejoicing over the death of a different Muslim soldier in the British miliary. Now the police want that tape as they investigate the sermons of this “mystery cleric” who may or may not have influenced the beheading plot.
All of that raises questions about religious liberty and free speech, among other concerns. Nevertheless, here is the key quote from the television tape:
The mystery cleric — now being urgently hunted by detectives — ranted about the dead serviceman at a meeting in a Birmingham mosque. He said: “There was an individual killed in Afghanistan recently. Do you know what was written in a newspaper? Hero of Islam! The hero of Islam is the one who separated his head from his shoulders!”
… Tapes of the programme were seized on Thursday in the week nine men were arrested over a plot to kidnap and behead a British Muslim soldier. A West Midlands Police source said: “These tapes could be crucial to the investigation. Not only is the death of a British Muslim soldier applauded, but there is talk of beheading. Considering the mosque is only a stone’s throw from where some of the arrested men lived, it is important we analyse the footage.”
Once again, there is a story here. The lives of moderate and liberal Muslims are at risk because, in supporting the values of Western society, they are being accused of being heretics and apostates. It is hard to embrace and praise some Muslims in the West without putting their lives at risk.
 | Posted at 12:33 pm |  Print
| Permalink | Trackback |
Comments (12) |
February 7, 2007, at 1:18 pm
…lives at risK, not rish.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
February 7, 2007, at 1:49 pm
>>According to the report, the planned use of the Internet was a “marked departure from previous terrorist plots.â€
You’re treating the semantic structure of the ‘and’ in the wrong way. When the original story reports that “The suspects are accused of devising a plot that included plans to kidnap, torture and behead a British Muslim soldier and broadcast video images of his killing on the Internet,” the important issue is not the internet broadcast, but the kidnap and killing of a British citizen on British soil. Though many have been kidnapped and killed in such ways in Iraq and abroad, terror on UK soil has been limited to overt acts of public destruction.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
February 7, 2007, at 1:52 pm
Such people as Khaled about el Fadl in the US have also received death threats. His “crime”? - writing books on Islamic law demonstrating that the fanatics interpretation of Islam is incorrect.
But I would also note that some in the US have a much milder form of that disease - questioning the Christianity of those who don’t share the same beliefs on abortion, for example.
“you’re not a real (Christian/Muslim) because you believe something different than what I do.” is all too common. Of course, and fortunately, the brickbats are verbal in the Christian case. But the root disease is the same: intolerance for those who interpret religious requirements differently.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
February 7, 2007, at 2:20 pm
questioning the Christianity of those who don’t share the same beliefs on abortion, for example.
Or the same Christian beliefs that “thou shalt not kill”
(unless they’re muslims and 1 % of the wealthiest “Christians” are getting fabulously more wealthy)
Thats written some where in the bible I’m sure
Right around where god tells the jews to kill all the medonite men, boys, and women, but the girls that have not know a man, keep for your selves.
Now, That some Christianity. Whats the problem with these stupid muslims. Bush already told them that we won.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
February 7, 2007, at 3:07 pm
OK, they were Midianites.
Numbers 31:17 and 18
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
February 7, 2007, at 4:19 pm
I think I’ll wait a bit longer and see if things continue on as they are. The police have already released two of the nine arrested without charge.
I remember the last ‘big terror plot!’ scare that supposedly involved British Muslims running a bomb factory and planning to blow up the divil an’ all, and then it turned out - no plot, no bomb factory, no charges.
So I won’t be pronouncing on the trial of the remaining seven just yet…
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
February 7, 2007, at 6:25 pm
For those who are really desirous of understanding a little bit about Islam, I recommend that they inquire about Louis Massignon ( 1883-1962).
Massignon was a very interesting person. He grew up a Roman Catholic in France, abandoned that in his teens, became a Moslem, so expert in Islam that he taught at the great university in Cairo, became interested in a Muslim Sufi saint, al-Hallaj, who had been martyred in the 9th century after declaring that his religious experience had unified him to God, and re-converted to Christianity becoming a Melkite priest in part because al-Hallaj had wanted to die like Christ, ( in fact he was crucified).
Massignon wrote extensively on Islam and Christianity. He’s the major source for the notion that Judaism, Christianity, and Islam are Abrahamic faiths since all three consider him to be a source of their faith.
I really wish the media would explore this facet of religion- individuals who have experientally explored other religions and who advocate mutual understanding and enrichment.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
February 7, 2007, at 7:29 pm
Put the doctrinal clubs away, folks, and please try to discuss the news media coverage or non-coverage of the issue in the post.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
February 7, 2007, at 9:55 pm
Yes, I do beleive it is newsworthy. Far too often the average person paints Islam with a broad brush.
This could help broaden the discussion and the non-fanatical muslims might not get pigeon-holed in with the extremist and not being put on the defensive about it.
But I do know that news organizations are business’s first. So they will go with the stories that will get the most return and there isn’t room for everything thats newsworthy.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
February 7, 2007, at 11:00 pm
Apropro of the topic, there is some controversy about whether or not Bush said that God told him to invade Iraq. A google search “god bush iraq quote” turned up references that are inconclusive such as http://www.commondreams.org/views03/0630-04.htm but nothing that appears to be a fully reliable source for the quote.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
February 8, 2007, at 5:10 am
Jerry ;
Read William Pfaff’s article on the U.S. and Manifest Destiny
http://www.nybooks.com/articles/19879
If you can read between the lines, you’ll see the “religious” aspects.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
February 8, 2007, at 2:28 pm
OK, a comment about news coverage.
TMATT says “The lives of moderate and liberal Muslims are at risk because, in supporting the values of Western society, they are being accused of being heretics and apostates. It is hard to embrace and praise some Muslims in the West without putting their lives at risk.”
When do we hear this from the MSM?
Like or Dislike:
0 
0